« 20 Engaging Engineer Volunteers Needed for High School Engineering Fair, May 26th | Main | The danger that awaits you from the cloud »

Apr 23, 2010

Comments

Tony Tanzillo

Don't feel tool bad about the AutoCAD docs.

Autodesk apparently is no longer providing ObjectARX API documentation to customers.

On their API download page, it says:

"Please Note: the Complete ObjectARX SDK includes the 2010 documentation. For the most recent 2011 documentation, please download the Documentation as well."

And in spite of that, the AutoCAD 2011 ObjectARX API documentation is nowhere to be found.

They say that one way to drive up your share price is to cut costs by sticking it to your customers. I suppose they're learned that one.

Tony Tanzillo

"Perhaps it is a plot to get users to pay for training?"

Ignoring the irony that your blog page is chock-full of advertising for training, I don't think the underlying motive is to get users to pay for training.

What is not obvious unless you carefully read the privacy policy for accessing Autodesk Web sites, is that everything you do on Autodesk's web site is tracked and monitored, to the point where the practice raises serious privacy issues that are beginning to get the attention of legislators.

So, it would appear that Autodesk intends to collect data relating to the use of the online documentation.


Tom Vasquez

It just seems to me that Autocad team does not believe in the providing help anymore. The quality of the help has been constantly going down in the last few years as well.

I remember when Deep Cloning was introduced with stellar documentation but now there are features that have not been documented in the last few years.

Tom Vasquez

Yes you are right about tracking user activity by autodesk on there website. I found the following JS snippets on the pages. There are a lot more similar things.

"var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-2967772-176");
pageTracker._trackPageview();"

Steve Johnson

Release 13 had the original FCS (sometimes called R13c0) plus 10 updates. The updates were R13a, R13c1, R13c2, R13c2a, R13c2b, R13c3, R13c3b, R13c3a (yes, in that order), R13c4 and R13c4a.

The updates weren't the problem, only a symptom. Shipping unfinished software in the first place was the problem. Same story here, 15+ years later.

Ralph Grabowski

Or in then-ceo Carol Bartz's famous words, "It's a marketing issue, not a technical one."

Sunith Babu L

As long as there is a decline in the help topics, training and video based helps will flourish.

I think I must take advantage of this . . .
:-)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Advertisements


Search This Blog


  •  

Translate

Thank you for visiting!