WorldCAD Access

Solved: Why the new Mac Mini Won't Work With an Ultrawide Monitor

...and how to fix the problem

This article has been updated with corrections and new information, thanks to readers ZinZ and infeeee.

A few weeks ago, I got the CB3 ultrawide monitor from Acer. It is gloriously 32" wide and makes my video tutorials (of CAD software) easier to edit. The resolution is 3440 x 1440, which in shorthand is 5K 3.5K. 

My newish Dell laptop runs with the new monitor, no problem: just connect any HDMI cable between the two. Here's a pic of the Dell running Camtasia video editing software on the ultrawide.

Last week I got the new X-based Mac Mini. I need it mostly only when I write about CAD software that runs on MacOS.

The computer had a problem right out of the box, when it didn't really understand it was connected to an ordinary 1920x1080 monitor. The image was too big, so that I could not access the menu bar. After a while, I was able to reach the menu bar blindly, and after a few reboots the Mac finally displayed correctly. Not a pleasant out-of-the-box experience

Next, I hooked it up to the Acer ultrawide monitor, but no joy. The monitor stayed blank, sometimes complaining "No cable attached." You might be able to imagine the time I wasted trying to get it to work. I have an ultrawide monitor and that Mac would work with it, darn it!

1. I tried Apple tech support where two techies tackled my trouble. In the end, the final advice from Apple was, "Ask Acer tech support."
2. I tried Acer tech support, and in the end the final advice from Acer was, "Ask Apple tech support."

I did some more mucking about, and on the second day finally got the ultrawide to work, but at the wrong resolution. Here are the resolutions listed by the Mac for the Acer monitor: none match the monitor's native resolution of 3440 x 1440 (click image for larger image).

Update 2: Reader infeeee suggested holding down the Option key while clicking Scaled. (Hold down the Alt key, when you have a Windows keyboard hooked up to a Mac.) It worked! The action forces MacOS to list all resolutions available, including the native resolution of 3440x1440:

And here is the the Mac Mini's output correctly displayed on the Acer ultrawide monitor:

As Management Speak (@managerspeak) so eloquently put it this morning, "The problem is that you are running the latest technology."

---

In my efforts to fix this problem, I came across important details at Apple's Mac Mini tech specs page, written confusingly. (Note that my Dell laptop supports three displays at once.)

• The HDMI port on the newest Mac Mini handles only 4K resolution. This is why the ultrawide monitor worked, but at lower resolution.
• The Thunderbolt port handles 8K. But I had no cable for this spec.

The Mac considers the HDMI port to be the primary display; one Thunderbolt port is used to provide the secondary display.

So, the new Mac with its X processor cannot handle what my year-old Dell laptop can: outputting more than 4K resolution out of its HDMI port the correct resolution for the monitor automatically. This makes me appreciate my Windows- and AMD-based Dell laptop even more.  A reader suggested that a higher quality cable might help, which I have ordered.

Then I found that 8K cables are rare. I finally found an 8K cable that handles Thunderport at one end with DisplayPort at the other. (The monitor has two HDMI and one DisplayPort ports.) I ordered it and await its arrival. 

In Which I Explain Media’s Confusion Re: Facebook

Not vis a vis

 

The tech media is salivating over Facebook's latest public relations disaster, and has much to say on the matter. Some are, however, puzzled by Facebook's machinations, and so to them I offer explanations.

- - -

Matthew Yglesias asks, “It is a little odd that Facebook would bother to research whether or not their product is harmful given that the answer obviously isn't going to alter their decision-making. What was the point?”

Me: It is a tactic to get ahead of the critics. If Facebook knows the flaws of in its product (as tobacco companies did), it can have answers ready when critics uncover the flaws.

In this case, however, its usual “We Are Facebook! Who Are You?” response has not worked as well as during earlier pr scandals.

- - -

Kara Swisher wonders, “These verbal gymnastics illuminate nothing, which is why I would love to have @nickclegg on for a substantive full hour discussion on Sway at this important moment. Unfortunately, we get persistent declines from FB, even as they book on press with less experience in this arena.”

Me:  It is a tactic to spar with media who are not expert in the subject at hand. A Brian Stelter and his staff aren’t going to know where to direct the dissection knife. Experienced tech journalists are to be avoided, at least until after Facebook has made sure that its messaging has suffocated competing narratives. Facebook will then use narrative-suffocation as proof there is no longer a scandal.

We see the same problem committed when country governments call on Facebook to explain itself.  In most case, neither the politicians nor their staff have much of an understanding of the world of technology.

- - -

Allow me to close with a commentator who gets it -- that most of the media doesn’t get it. Yael Eisenstat writes,

A plea before the whistleblower speaks tonight: don't fall for Facebook's playbook of changing the conversation to be about her, instead of about the documents she exposed. Any journalist/commentator who allows this to happen is doing a disservice. Speaking out is hard. Full stop.

Remember: Tobacco companies used endorsements from doctors to sell cigarettes as a solution to solve throat problems (a.k.a. the T-zone) caused by smoking. Facebook is no different.

Using Asynchronous Communication in CAD

Guest editorial by Cedric Desbordes

 

More than any other DWG vendor, Graebert of Germany has done more to connect the primary design platforms with one another -- desktop/laptop on Linux/Mac/Windows; tablet/phone on Android/iOS; and Web browsers. The name of the company may not be familiar to you, as they tend to sell white label CAD. Companies like Corel, Dassault Systems, and Onshape use Graebert's "ARES" code for their DWG editors.

Here, business development manager Cedric Desbordes describes how this trifecta of CAD platforms is useful for today's WFH environment. Asynchronous communication means that all parties don't have to be online at the same time -- this like sending an email, instead of placing a phone call, which is synchronous communication. 

- - -

With so many professionals forced out of office environments by the pandemic, even the most hesitant companies have had to reorganize their workflows to accommodate remote workers. During the first lockdowns, I was surprised to see large organizations using older and very expensive techniques like virtualization or VPNs [virtual private networks]. I remember too how the press was skeptical about our offer to make ARES Kudo [Graebert's browser-based CAD viewer and editor] free of charge for a period of time.
 
When this all started, people thought the virus would be a problem for only a couple of months, so the priority was to keep all systems in place and avoid stressing users, even if this meant a very slow AutoCAD streamed to your computer from virtual machines. So, during the first wave, IT teams acted more like firefighters: they weren't trying to implement new products or substantially reshape workflows.
 
Today, organizations understand that the virus-induced crisis is not acute, but chronic. It will continue to affect us for a long time. New waves or variants may come, resulting in further lockdowns. More importantly, working with remote team members has became the new normal. Previously, your co-workers sat next to you and worked the same office hours as you. Now you see them reorganizing their work hours, and working from different places, at different times, and even from other countries.

Recently, I watched a Webinar from Onshape. The guest speaker was a customer we have in common, Kichler Lighting in the USA. They use our ARES Trinity together with Onshape. Kichler has suppliers in China and adds new ones frequently. In the lighting industry, trends change rapidly, and so they need to react quickly with new products. Reducing time-to-market with suppliers in China that they have potentially never met is a challenge. Part of the challenge is to secure remote access and to synchronize drawings; another aspect is collaboration by sharing ideas, commenting on issues, and getting design changes validated.
 
One key takeaway from the Kichler story is that communication was significantly improved through online collaboration. No one was afraid to interrupt other users with questions or comments. It was a smooth, asynchronous flow of communication. As a consequence, time-to-market was reduced.
 
This is where communication tools like online meetings or email or chat fall short. Users need to be able to collaborate in-place (inside drawings and documents) and do so asynchronously.
 
One clear example of asynchronous communication is how people use Google Docs:

• Manage and revoke user rights by determining who can only view, and who can comment and/or edit
• Comments help to organize the work and extend the collaboration to more people, without altering the document
• Document history that goes back in time to show what has changed, and who changed it
•  People working together as a team, but without needing to work at the same time
• Notifications to stay updated (without needing to open documents) and to react faster when help is needed.

What we are achieving with our Trinity workflow is very similar for DWG drawings (files in the cloud, user rights, view-only links, markups and comments, email notifications), but with additional advantages:

Do it your way. For each project, users can decide whether to keep working with local files or to access files from the cloud. Also, it is not required to switch to cloud-based ARES Kudo to benefit from collaboration features, as they are also found in desktop ARES Commander. Users in organizations can go at their pace — there is no abrupt/disruptive transition to new tools or workflows.
 
Your cloud. In contrast to Google Docs, ARES does not force users to place files on our servers. We recognize that many companies have already made the decision on which cloud storage provider(s) to use. There is no reason to isolate DWG files from other files, so it is just common sense to for ARES to connect to a large number of existing cloud services, as well as provide the WebDAV protocol to connect easily to any other service.

In addition, we partner with AWS for those customers asking for a dedicated infrastructure, as well as to offer some storage with ARES Kudo Drive for users who have nothing in place and so want first to experiment with a few projects on our servers.
 
Highly secure. Files stay on the servers customers are already using, and ARES is used only to edit them. Our infrastructure is reviewed by the AWS team for security.

I think another key difference with Google Docs is that our industry has a strong need to improve the workflow between the users who are producing drawings at the office (or in home offices) with others in the field needing that technical information while working at a construction site, who are on customer visits, or work at a facility or factory.

Efficient interaction between the two groups requires software with the following capabilities for workers in the field:

• Access any drawing without planning ahead of time which files to take with them
• Always view the latest version of the drawing to avoid mistakes, which cost
• Enrich the project with useful feedback collected in the field to help the users editing drawings to reduce time-to-market
• Email notifications to that allow every user to follow the project updates, and jump into the file promptly when needed

From my perspective, view-only links are the most appealing feature to get new users started with cloud-based workflows. As we offer some free storage with the ARES Kudo Drive, it becomes possible for ARES Commander users to upload one of their files, create a view-only link, and send it to a colleague or customer who can view — and comment or markup — for free.

The best reactions to Facebook's new surveillance sunglasses

All Your Face Are Belong to Facebook

 

I once met the head of a design firm for lunch. As we headed out, he showed me what had just arrived in the mail for him. He was pretty excited about the pen with its built-in camera. He took it with us as we walked to the restaurant, looking around for what to photograph. I think he began to realize that pointing a pen repeatedly at people was a bit weird-looking. During lunch, the pen rested awkwardly between us.

Google Glasses failed. Snapshat Spectacles failed. And now Facebook has its surveillance technology built into Ray-Ban brand sunglasses. "Miniaturization is so crazy. These glasses have two cameras, a battery, three microphones, two speakers and bluetooth, and weigh *five grams* more than a regular pair of Ray-Bans," reports Tom Gara (@tomgara).

Here are the best reactions to the new product, which, it seems to me, is destined to become as popular as 3D TV.

- - -

Steve Kovach (@stevekovach): Facebook loves to copy everything Snapchat does. This time it's glasses, 5 years after Snap did it.

Katie Notopoulos (BuzzFeed News): Facebook Is Making Camera Glasses, Ha Ha Oh No.

They have an LED warning light so that bystanders know you are taking a video. I taped it over. A FB exec told me this is a violation of the terms of service of the glasses (oops).

Sebastiaan de With (@sdw): I am shocked, absolutely shocked that such a privacy-respecting company culture like Facebook's would produce a wearable camera product that feels like an almost dystopian-creepy invasion of privacy.

Joshua Benton (@jbenton): I don't get why Facebook wouldn't brand these as either Instagram or Oculus glasses, both brands that lack most of FB's brand baggage around privacy and everything icky.

@rmac18: So the privacy expert that Facebook is having defend its new Wearable Glasses works for an organization that is funded by Facebook.

Facebook sent reporters covering their glasses launch a list of supposed “third-party” privacy and consumer groups that it consulted for the product. So I did some digging. FB funds at least 4 of the 5 groups. Future of Privacy Forum is one. It also shows the breadth of Facebook's influence over nonprofits that rely on donations.

Yves Adele Fartlow (@vogon): It's very silly to me that people think that the audience for the facebook ray-bans is going to be the same as the audience for google glass, like nah it's going to be an entirely different group of people with no respect for other people's boundaries

Andrew Losowsky (@losowsky): Remember that whole thing where Google Street View cars were passively scraping everyone's wifi information? Imagine that but Facebook with all of our faces and locations.

@pinboard: I'm guessing they've got Scoble duct taped to the floor of a Facebook van somewhere, so you can't say this product is 100% bad.

James Vincent (@jjvincent): There's been some comment on how basic the functionality of Facebook's glasses are — no AR, no assistant, etc. But that's on purpose, because the main feature of these things is getting the public used to the idea of everyone constantly wearing cameras.

Alex Kantrowitz (@kantrowitz): My review of the Facebook Glasses: Nope

 

 

My 137 ebooks & 233 training videos

The List, part ii

 

These are the 137 ebooks I worked on beginning in 2002 and going through to 2020, an average of seven per year. Many of these can be purchased from https://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/ebooksonline/. When added to my 108 print books, that represents 245 books in 31 years. 

The advantage of ebooks over print books is that I eliminate the publisher and make 97% of the cover price of a book. The publisher typically handles editing, printing, distribution, and marketing -- in exchange for paying me an average of 7% of the cover price. 

 

How I Began in eBooks

I had written a series of customizing tutorials (Tailoring AutoCAD) for a tabloid AutoCAD magazine, whose editor permitted me to republish my work after three months. I posted the series to my Web site, and a reader wondered if I could collect them into a single PDF file for ease of downloading. That became my first ebook -- Tailoring AutoCAD for AutoCAD 2000, released in December 2002.

Each year, I added more to the ebook, until by the AutoCAD 2006 edition it had tripled in size. I realized it suffered from two problems: parts of the book never needed updating (like LISP and linetypes), and at 420 pages the ebook was getting fat.

At this point, I spun off parts of the book so that I needed to update only the parts that changed. And so we have titles like Tailoring Dynamic Blocks 2009 and Tailoring Dynamic Blocks 2010 -- and no new editions afterwards, as Autodesk no longer updated dynamic blocks with new functions. By AutoCAD 2015, I stopped writing about AutoCAD entirely, as Autodesk fell to adding only a few new functions each year.

I put together a few ebooks for CAD running on Macintosh computers, but sales were dismal enough for me to give up on them.

 

Tutorial Videos

Since 2014 I've produced 233 training videos, typically 4-5 minutes long:

• Bricsys: 161 videos
• C3D Labs: 2 videos
• Nanosoft: 70 videos

 

History of Training

My time in writing about CAD shows the changes in technology prevalent for training:

1. 1990-2014: print books
2. 2002-2020: ebooks
3. 2014-date: videos

 

Other Writing

In addition to books, ebooks, and videos, I've participated in the following:

• Co-launched new magazines for Microstation, Visio, and AutoCAD
• Launched these newsletters: The CAD Market, CAD++, upFront.eZine, and Visions.eZine
• Wrote magazine articles for CADalyst, Cadence, Architecture, InfoWorld, Design Engineering, Jon Peddie Associates, CAD lab, CAD infinitum, CADinfo.net, Federal Government News, MicroStation Manager, Visio Smartpages, Technical Design Solutions, IMAGINiT Technologies, Vancouver AutoCAD User Society, and PC Magazine.
• Whitepapers for various clients.

 

The eBook List

* Book titles with an asterisk are ebook versions made from materials first produced for a print edition

All CAD Systems

1.   CAD Manager's Guidebook* - Apr 01

2.   The Russian MCAD Market - Jan 10

3.   CAD & BIM: Is There a Free Pass? - Nov 10

4.   MobileCAD is Reaching Maturity - Oct 15

5.   Best CAD Practices - Nov 17

 

AutoCAD

6.   AutoCAD 2013 Reference Guide Rough Edition* - Apr 13

7.   Inside AutoCAD’s Multilines and Splines* - Aug 2008

 

8.   Tailoring AutoCAD 2000 - Dec 02 (my first ebook)

9.   Tailoring AutoCAD 2004 - Apr 03

10. Tailoring AutoCAD 2004, Workbook Edition - Nov 03

11. Tailoring AutoCAD 2005 - Mar 04

12. Tailoring AutoCAD 2006 - Jun 05

13. Tailoring AutoCAD 2007 - Dec 05

14. Tailoring AutoCAD 2008 - March 07

15. Tailoring AutoCAD 2009 - Sept 08

16. Tailoring AutoCAD 2010 - Aug 09

17. Tailoring AutoCAD 2011/12 - Jun 11

18. Tailoring AutoCAD 2012 for Mac & Windows - Sep 11

19. Tailoring AutoCAD 2013 - Jun 12

20. Tailoring Animation - Jan 07

21. Tailoring Animation 2012 - Jul 12

22. Tailoring AutoLisp Diesel & DCL - Dec 06

23. Tailoring CUI - Sep 05

24. Tailoring CUI 2009 - Dec 08

25. Tailoring CUI 2010 - Jul 09

26. Tailoring CUI 2011-12 - Junl 11

27. Tailoring CUI 2013 - May 12

28. Tailoring Dynamic Blocks - Aug 05

29. Tailoring Dynamic Blocks 2009 - Dec 08

30. Tailoring Dynamic Blocks 2010 - Oct 09 (my best selling ebook)

31. Tailoring QuickCalc - Sep 05

32. Tailoring Render - Oct 06

33. Tailoring Render 2012 - May 11

34. Tailoring Visual Styles - Apr 06

 

35. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2005 - Jan 04

36. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2006 - Jan 05

37. What's Inside? AutoCAD LT 2006 - Jan 05

38. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2007 - Mar 06

39. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2008 - Feb 07

40. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2009 - Feb 08

41. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2010 - Jan 09

42. What's Inside? AutoCAD for Mac - Aug 10

43. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2011 - Jan 10

44. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2012 - Feb 11

45. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2013 - Feb 12

46. What's Inside? AutoCAD 2014 - Mar 13

 

AutoCAD LT

47. Inside AutoCAD LT Volume 1: 2D Drafting* - Nov 07

48. Inside AutoCAD LT Volume 2: Management and Customization* - Nov 07

 

BricsCAD

Bricsys originally based BricsCAD on IntelliCAD, and then with version 8 switched to its own code

49. BricsCAD 9 for AutoCAD Users

50. BricsCAD 10 for AutoCAD Users - Sep 09

51. BricsCAD 11 for AutoCAD Users - Dec 10

52. BricsCAD 12 for AutoCAD Users - Nov 11

53. BricsCAD 13 for AutoCAD Users - Nov 12

54. BricsCAD 14 for AutoCAD Users - Dec 13

55. BricsCAD 15 for AutoCAD Users - Dec 14

56. BricsCAD 16 for AutoCAD Users - Dec 15

57. BricsCAD 17 for AutoCAD Users - Nov 16

58. BricsCAD 18 for AutoCAD Users - Nov 17

59. BricsCAD 19 for AutoCAD Users - Nov 18

60. BricsCAD 20 for AutoCAD Users - Oct 19

 

61. Customizing BricsCAD 4 - Apr 03

62. Customizing BricsCAD 5 - Oct 04

63. Customizing BricsCAD 8 - Sept 07

64. Customizing BricsCAD 9 - Mar 09

65. Customizing BricsCAD 10 - Jan 10

66. Customizing BricsCAD 11 - Dec 10

67. Customizing BricsCAD 12 - Dec 11

68. Customizing BricsCAD 13 - Feb 13

69. Customizing BricsCAD 15 - Mar 15

70. Customizing BricsCAD 16 - May 16

71. Customizing BricsCAD 17 - Nov 16

72. Customizing BricsCAD 18 - Dec 17

73. Customizing BricsCAD 19 - Jan 19

74. Customizing BricsCAD 20 - Dec 19

 

75. Learn BricsCAD 8 In a Day - Dec 07

76. Learn BricsCAD 9 In a Day - Mar 09

77. Learn BricsCAD 10 In a Day - Dec 09

78. Learn BricsCAD 11 In a Day - Jan 11

79. Learn BricsCAD 12 In a Day - Oct 12

80. Learn BricsCAD 13 In a Day - Feb 13

81. Inside BricsCAD 14 - Mar 14 (the title changed from “Learn in a Day” to “Inside”)

82. Inside BricsCAD 15 - Feb 15

83. Inside BricsCAD 16 - Apr 16

84. Inside BricsCAD 17 - Dec 16

85. Inside BricsCAD 18 - Dec 18

86. Inside BricsCAD 19 - Nov 18

87. Inside BricsCAD 20 - Nov 19

 

A+ CAD, CADopia, DWG Editor, IntelliCAD, progeCAD 

IntelliCAD Technical Consortium programs IntelliCAD, which is distributed by other companies

88. Customizing CADopia 4 - Apr 03

89. Customizing CADopia 5 - Oct 04

90. Customizing CADopia 6 - Sep 05

91. Inside CADopia 5

92. Inside CADopia 6 - Sep 05

 

93. Inside A+CAD 6 - Jul 07

94. Inside A+CAD 2010 - Sept 09

 

95. Inside IntelliCAD 5 - Nov 04

96. Inside IntelliCAD 6 - Oct 05

97. Tailoring IntelliCAD - Jan 03

98. Tailoring IntelliCAD 4 - Apr 03

99. Tailoring IntelliCAD 5 - Oct 04

100.           Tailoring IntelliCAD 6 - Oct 05

 

101.           IntelliCAD, The Un-AutoCAD - Nov 05

 

102.           SolidProfessor DWGEditor - Jul 07

 

103.           Inside progeCAD 2009 - Dec 08

104.           Inside progeCAD 2017 - May 16

105.           Tailoring progeCAD 2009 - Feb 09

 

ARES, DraftSight, CorelCAD

Graebert GmbH programs ARES for itself, DraftSight for Dassault Systemes, and CorelCAD for Corel

106.           Ares for AutoCAD Users

107.           Ares 2 for AutoCAD Users

108.           Ares 2014 for AutoCAD Users

109.           Ares 2015 for AutoCAD Users

 

110.           Inside Ares

111.           Inside Ares for Linux

112.           Inside Ares for Mac

113.           Inside Ares 2013

114.           Inside Ares 2014

115.           Inside Ares 2015

116.           Inside Ares 2016

117.           Inside Ares 2017

118.           Inside Ares 2018

119.           Inside Ares 2019 (at 650 pages, my largest ebook)

Inside Ares 2020 was split into three titles with a combined length of 770 pages:

120.           Book i: Starting Computer-Aided Design With Ares Commander 2020

121.           Book ii: Modern Editing and Collaboration On Mobile and Cloud

122.           Book iii: Advanced CAD With Ares Commander

 

123.           Inside CorelCAD

124.           Inside CorelCAD 2013

125.           Inside CorelCAD 2014

126.           Inside CorelCAD 2015

127.           Inside CorelCAD 2016

128.           Inside CorelCAD for Mac

 

129.           Inside DraftSight

130.           Inside DraftSight 2

131.           Inside DraftSight 3

132.           Inside DraftSight 2015

133.           Inside DraftSight 2016

 

Generic CADD, General CADD

After Autodesk bought and shut down DOS-based Generic CADD, General CADD Products resurrected it as a Windows program

134.           Inside Generic CADD 6* - Dec 02

135.           Inside General CADD Pro - Nov 02

 

Visio

136.           Inside Visio 2002* - Dec 03

137.           Tailoring Visio 2002* - Nov 03

 

 

 

My 108 Books in Print

The List, part i

 

These are the 108 print books I worked on, beginning in the summer 1990. I worked on most of these between the years 1991 and 2014, an average of five books a year. Many thanks to Colleen McColghlin, who as my agent found contacts publishers and encouraged me in my desire to become a book author. Then in 2003. I started producing ebooks and in 2015 began producing training videos. These are lists for another day.

 

Author *

*) I wrote these books from scratch, or else updated the book for new versions of software.

1.          The AutoCAD Technical Reference (my first book!)

2.          AutoCAD for Windows

3.          AutoCAD 2004 Family of Products

4.          AutoCAD 2010: Update Guide

5.          Successful CAD Managers Handbook

6.          CAD Manager's Guidebook

7.          Illustrated AutoCAD R12 Quick Reference

8.          Illustrated AutoCAD R13 for DOS Quick Reference

9.          Illustrated AutoCAD R13 for Windows Quick Reference

10.        Illustrated AutoCAD R14 Quick Reference

11.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2000 Quick Reference

12.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2002 Quick Reference

13.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2004 Quick Reference

14.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2005 Quick Reference

15.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2006 Quick Reference

16.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2007 Quick Reference

17.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2008 Quick Reference

18.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2009 Quick Reference

19.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2010 Quick Reference

20.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2011 Quick Reference

21.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2012 Quick Reference

22.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2013 Quick Reference

23.        Illustrated AutoCAD 2014 Quick Reference Update

24.        Illustrated AutoCAD LT2 Quick Reference

25.        Illustrated AutoCAD R13 Programming Quick Reference

26.        ArchiCAD for AutoCAD Users

27.        FelixCAD for AutoCAD Users (incomplete)

28.        IntelliCAD 98 for AutoCAD Users

29.        TurboCAD 5 for AutoCAD Users

30.        TurboCAD 12 for AutoCAD Users

31.        VDraft for AutoCAD Users

32.        Learn AutoCAD LT in a Day

33.        Learn AutoCAD LT 2 in a Day

34.        Learn AutoCAD LT 3 in a Day

35.        Learn AutoCAD LT 97 in a Day

36.        Learn AutoCAD LT 98

37.        Learn AutoCAD LT 2000

38.        Learn AutoCAD LT 2000i

39.        Learn AutoCAD LT 2002

40.        AutoCAD LT 2006: The Definitive Guide

41.        Learn GeneriCADD in a Day

42.        Learning Autodesk Inventor 2008

43.        Reviewer’s Guide to IntelliCAD 98

44.        Using AutoCAD 2004 Basics

45.        Using AutoCAD 2004 Basics - Instructor Guide

46.        Using AutoCAD 2004 Advanced

47.        Using AutoCAD 2004 Advanced - Instructor Guide

48.        Using AutoCAD 2005 Basics

49.        Using AutoCAD 2005 Basics - Instructor Guide

50.        Using AutoCAD 2005 Advanced

51.        Using AutoCAD 2005 Advanced - Instructor Guide

52.        Using AutoCAD 2006 Basics

53.        Using AutoCAD 2006 Basics - Instructor Guide

54.        Using AutoCAD 2006 Advanced

55.        Using AutoCAD 2006 Advanced - Instructor Guide

56.        Using AutoCAD 2007

57.        Using AutoCAD 2007 - Instructor Guide

58.        Using AutoCAD 2008

59.        Using AutoCAD 2008 - Instructor Guide

60.        Using AutoCAD 2009

61.        Using AutoCAD 2009 - Instructor Guide

62.        Using AutoCAD 2010

63.        Using AutoCAD 2010 - Instructor Guide

64.        Using AutoCAD 2011

65.        Using AutoCAD 2011- Instructor Guide

66.        Visio 4 for Everyone

67.        Learn Visio 5

68.        Learn Visio 2000

69.        Learn Visio 2002

70.        Learn to Diagram Visio 2000

71.        Learn to Diagram with Visio 2002

72.        Advanced Visio 5

73.        Advanced Visio 2000

74.        Advanced Visio 2002

75.        Web Developer's Quick Reference

 

Re-author *

*) I took over writing these books, which originally were written by another author

76.        AutoCAD 2023 for Dummies

77.        Basics of A+CAD

78.        Fundamentals of Modern Drafting Workbook

79.        LTI Instructor Guide

80.        LTI Workbook

81.        OLCAD 106 - Civil

82.        OLCAD 103 - Arch

83.        OLCAD 208 - GDT

84.        Using AutoCAD, 3rd Edition (Que)

85.        Using AutoCAD R13 for DOS (Delmar)

86.        Using AutoCAD R13 for Windows

87.        Using AutoCAD R13 for Windows - Instructor Guide

88.        Using AutoCAD R14 for DOS

89.        Using AutoCAD R14 - Instructor Guide

90.        Using AutoCAD R14 for Windows

91.        Using AutoCAD 2000

92.        Using AutoCAD 2002

93.        VisualSeries - Basic AutoCAD 2D

94.        VisualSeries - Advanced AutoCAD 2D

 

Co-author*

*) Another author and I worked on these books at the same time

95.        MicroStation 4 for AutoCAD R11 Users, first edition

96.        MicroStation for AutoCAD Users, never published

97.        MicroStation 95 for AutoCAD R13 Users

98.        MicroStation for AutoCAD Users, never published

99.        MicroStation SE for AutoCAD R14 Users (Delmar)

 

Contributor*

*) I contributed material to these books

 100.      Architectural - Chapter 7

101.      AutoCAD: A Problem Solving Approach R14

102.      Harnessing AutoCAD R12 for Windows

 

Technical Editor*

*) I edited these books for technical accuracy

103.      3D Printing with Autodesk

104.      3D Modern Printing with TinkerCAD

105.      AutoCAD 2013 for Dummies

106.      AutoCAD 2014 for Dummies

107.      AutoCAD 2017 for Dummies

108.      AutoCAD 2020 for Dummies

 

Copy Editor*

*) I edited the text of this book

109.      Devil Bush by David Waynes (never published)

 

Envisioned

In addition to the books listed here, there were writing projects that publishers proposed to me, but that never got off the ground. These include books about Corel Draw and Front Page.

 

 

 

Bands at the 9th Annual Musical Walkalong

Galiano Island, Canada

 

Each year the Galiano Conservancy Association puts on an afternoon of hiking, music, and art. The fundraiser subsidizes 1,500 children to come to Galiano Island to live in nature, which they might otherwise not experience. The last number I heard was $23,ooo raised at this year's event, which did yet not include the amount made from the silent auction.

The walk goes through the forested trails and rocky cliffs of Galiano Island, on the Pacific coast side of Canada. Here are photos I took of some of the performers at this year's event.

 

Kurt Ward-Theiss playing Irish tunes on the mandola

---

Catriona Day on cello, with Saltspring Island in the background

---

Emma, Dustin, Greg, and Connor folk ensemble at Trincomali lookout

---

Dan Gaucher on drums, James Merger on upright bass playing freeform jazz

---

Orla Scott on accordion (at left) along Appleby trail

---

 

Stefan Brunoff painting with water colors by Chrystal Cove

---

 

www.galianoconservancy.ca

 

 

When Windows Update Stalls at 35%... or 100%

Replug

 

Despite the tech media having shrieked confidently and loudly about the death of Windows 7, Microsoft continues to update it and I continue to use it.

Last week, an update alert appeared in the operating system's taskbar, and so I installed it. I think the update had to do with that 20-year-old hole in the print spooler software that could let a malicious actor (bad guy) wreck your computing experience.

I installed it, and after rebooting the computing, Windows Update stalled at 35%. I let it sit there for a long time before manually restarting the computer. I won't describe all the details of my attempts to fix the problem, but it took four hours to get my computer running again. 

I was the cause of the problem.

My desktop computer's CD drive no longer works, but the computer dutifully checks for it during boot-ups. That slows the booting process, as the near-broken drive grinds away for a half-minute of so. I figured I'd be smart and disable the CD drive through the BIOS.

Solving that problem mixed up Windows, causing it to not complete the update. When I clued into what the problem was, I re-enabled the CD drive, and Windows gratefully completed its appointed task.

During the Windows update process, make no changes to the hardware!

 

 

 

Best tweet reactions to new BSOD

Black screen of death

 

As most of the tech media are Apple-maniacs, they don't really don't care about Windows 11's hottest new feature -- running Android apps -- and tend to be really, really clueless about the technique of side-loading.

A fact none of the tech media mentioned is that running Android apps on Windows is not new: it's been possible for many years (going back to 2009), as there are Intel CPU-versions of Android. See pcmag.com/how-to/3-free-ways-to-run-android-apps-on-your-pc for some examples.

As a result of Apple Devotion, we were fed a lot of misinformed Android Development articles.

- - -

What the tech media instantly understood, however, was the change to BSOD. The blue screen, reminiscent of MS-DOS days, covers over your not-yet-saved work when Windows crashes. Today, it was announced, Microsoft is changing the color to black in Windows 11.

In some of headlines reporting on the change (all re-reported from the original article in Verge), you can sense the writers' relief at an easy-to-understand change, like this headline: "Microsoft made a huge change to the Blue Screen of Death in Windows 11."

- - -

Here are the best tweets that I collected from Tech-meme:

Black is the new blue. Microsoft's notorious Blue Screen of Death, that's been around in one form or another since Windows 1.0, is going black. One proud employee, Raymond Chen, claimed authorship of the original #BSOD.
     - Ami (@switchshot)

At least we get to keep using BSOD. Microsoft once again delivers on backward compatibility.
     - Sriram Karra (@skarra)

Finally true innovation.
     - Patrick Beja (@notpatrick)

The real Windows 11 story.
     - James Randall (@jamesdrandall)

The sheer vision. They have brown, burgundy, beige, bronze, brass screens of death to go. With a new Windows every five years, they have the next three decades of failures covered.
     - Rahul Gaitonde (@RahulGaitonde)

It's like losing an old friend. A really shitty friend.
     - @datnofact

Looks like Apple will need to update its snarky Windows PC icon in macOS.
     - Tim Hardwick (@waxeditorial)

It's more appropriate, really.
     - Varad Mehta (@varadmehta)

 

 

 

 

Best Tweets: Facebook Ad-ifies Oculus

Facebook destroys what's left of VR

 

It's all a game. Advertisers lie to themselves that we can't get enough of their ads, while we bob and weave to avoid them like a goalie at the World Cup. (Of hockey. Which game did were you thinking of?)

The goal always has been to figure out how to best force us to view ads. With radio, we switch to another station. On tv, we go to the bathroom. In magazines, we flip to the next page. On Web sites, we install ad blockers. 

But what if there were a technology that could put our heads in vises, clamp pairs of rather tiny tvs to our foreheads, point each one directly at an eyeball, and then to force us to watch ads, A Clockwork Orange-style? Now that would be technology worth paying $2 billion for.

With Facebook's announcement that it will start feeding ads to people who had paid already $500 for Oculus VR headsets and had already paid for the games they were playing in it, the virtual reality industry began mourning its now-inevitable death.

Image from Slashgear of what ads in Oculus will look like -- like the boards in a hockey game

I, for one, had long predicted the collapse of VR, as surely as the collapse of 3D tv. Technology cannot be mass-marketed for technology's sake, and after 30 years of VR being prophesized as inevitable and now today as popular as Linux on the desktop, Facebook deserves our gratitude for nailing that particular coffin shut.

But before the hammering starts, Facebook is acknowledging its oncoming failure with this hedging statement (my emphasis): "You can manage what ads you want to see and we're including controls to hide specific ads or hide ads from an advertiser completely. Ads in VR will be different from ads elsewhere and this is a space that will take time and people's feedback to get right."

(I seem to recall a certain fruit-themed computer company promising the same about its upcoming ads, which turned out exactly the same as every other ad. Adz iz adz. There is no different way.)

PS: My wife's reaction, after I told her about what's happening with VR goggles: "People still use those?"

- - -

Meanwhile, the people's feedback has been right, even priceless, worth more than that $2 billion Facebook paid for Oculus:

"Hell yes ads in my eyeballs grim meathook future let's go."
     - Matt Weinberger (@gamoid)

"I told everyone FB RealityLabs would put ads in the headset, they were already planning it. Meanwhile @thedextriarchy reported in January @boztank [Andrew Bosworth, vp Facebook Reality Labs, and former vp of ads] lying, 'We're not really focused on business model.' We are all getting slowly boiled in a pot by Facebook."
     - Cix (@cixliv)

"Oh look, the reason people jumped ship on Oculus years ago."
     - Geoffrey (@t3hero_)

"Oculus says in a blog post they 'have no plans to use movement data to target ads,' but yet nothing in their privacy policy prevents them from doing so."
     - Kent Bye (@kentbye)

"Aaaand that's why I sold my Quest when they got acquired. Yay, delayed gratification."
     - Glytch (@glytchtech)

"This is definitely what VR was missing for mass adoption."
    - Aaron Levie (@levie)

"You can escape reality. But you can't escape ads. That's the reality."
     - Subrahmanyam Kvj (@sub8u)

"They also 'have no plans to build a facial recognition database.' These statements are as hollow as their so-called 'responsible innovation principles' that deliberately ignore to 'protect identity of minorities (humans).' Blabber blabber blabber..."
     - Kavya Pearlman (@kavyapearlman)

"Gross. Seriously, super gross."
    - @thelinuxexp

 

 

Siemens PLM Media Q&A

CAD? We've heard of it

 

Siemens Digital Industries Software last month held a user group meeting online, and then invited the media to a Q&A with execs the following day. The few times I have interacted with ceo Tony Hemmelgarn, I found him to be a realistic leader who doesn't do the painful-to-hear isn't-everything-amazing?, we're-really-excited! marketing schtick. 

There was, however, one embarrassing moment when during the keynote he referenced Lordstown Motors using Siemens software to design their electric pickup truck -- the day after Lordstown announced it was cutting this year's production from 2,500 to 1,000 pickups. Research had earlier shown that most of its 100,000 pre-orders were unlikely to materialize. Subsequently, the company announced it would produce 0 trucks for the rest of the year, and its CEO left. 

Here are some of the notes I took during the Q&A held with us in the CAD media:

- - -

Since 2007, Siemens has spent e10 billion on 30+ acquisitions. Reaching all the way  back to 2007 is the year Siemens acquired UGS for its NX, Solid Edge, and TeamCenter software. The total does not not include spending on R&D. 

While Siemens is one of the sensible CAD firms knowing that MCAD belongs primarily on the desktop, they are nevertheless pushing their Xcelerator Cloud Platform so hard that MCAD got no mention, to my disappointment. Nevertheless, Siemens could use the tagline, "Cloud Your Way," as it runs on public cloud, private cloud, and on-premise. 

Electrical and electronic CAD is now 1/3 of the biz and over the last 18 months as been the fastest growing part of Siemens PLM. This due partly to acquisitions; indeed, most of the press releases I get  these days from Siemens have to do with ECAD, which I don't cover.

We can’t have digital twins today without electronics, and Siemens has three of the pieces:

• IC integrated circuits
• Electrical systems, like harnesses
• PCB design

"There is a great need for it, as we see in the chip shortages and number of car companies wanting to design their own electronics, rather than using off the shelf parts," said Mr Hemmelgarn. He said he wants his company to make the digital twin the most comprehensive it can be. He has, of course, internal incentive, given that the rest of Siemens is a giant industrial firm that eats its own dog food.

Q&A

Q: TeamCenter X was announced a year ago, how it is going?

A: Going better than I expected. TeamCenter X lets Siemens target small organizations. We replaced some Teamcenter components to make X more agile and flexible. TeamCenter is #1 PLM solution on the market today, with customers such as SAP, IBM, and US Air Force globally. Fujitsu has its own PLM, but decided to offer TeamCenter in Japan. 

Mendix is for customers to personalize services without having to be a software developer. We have 200,000 third-party developers around the world.

 

Q: How does Xcellerator fit in?

A: Xcellerator is one common architecture, packaged business components to build applications. It puts all services in the cloud. Customers want the cloud for collaboration, sharing, and integration -- on-prem, public (Amazon), or private cloud.

 

Q: Do you expect all customers to move to SaaS?

A: We will have more info on SaaS [software as a service] for you in the future. We are not going to force our customers, one way or another, onto business models that don’t make sense to them. However, there is value in SaaS to our customers, such as us taking care of things for them, or high-performance computing. I think that the worry about IP [intellectual property] on the cloud is going away. I think the transition to SaaS will happen faster than we expect.

Just because you put something on the cloud doesn’t mean it is more integrated than anything else. What do we mean by integration? Data flowing from application to application, to make decisions faster -- that is true integration, that’s not the cloud. Integration is work, and we work at it. BTW, we are never finished with it and so we keep making acquisitions to keep building out integration modules.

 

Q: Which manufacturing techs are generating hype, which are actually valuable?

A: Additive manufacturing was overhyped five, six years ago. "Everyone" is going to have a 3D printer at home: if your coffee cup breaks, you don’t run to Wal-Mart, but you print your own. That was the hype. The reality is that additive manufacturing is a new business model, in the the flexibility it brings to businesses.

Low-code, like our Mendix, had a lot of hype early on, but now is experiencing rapid growth due to the demand for applications without needing to involve the IT department. We can call it “citizens’ development.” We went from “Mendix can build the perfect application if we all contribute to it,” to me copying someone else’s low-code, adding a couple of buttons, and having something that works for me.

IoT [Internet of things] had a lot of hype, it still does, but slowly it is being integrated. It was initially a lot like AM.

 

Q: Why do you continue to sell Parasolid to competitors?

A: Open is one of our three strategies, as I don’t think closed works. Much of the success about Teamcenter is its openness. There are over four million users of Parasolid, with the same math behind them. We add three or four new customers a month who license Parasolid: I think of the value behind that. There is no data loss for our customers in the geometry; there is, of course, some data loss in the intelligence attached to geometry.

 

Q: How is your business doing?

A: We can’t say much about our financial results. Last quarter we had double-digit growth in our software business, although PLM is not growing as fast as our EDA business.

Our toughest customers are inside Siemens. We get beat up by the: "Why can’t it do this, do that?" We use our software to design our products, to design our plants.

https://www.sw.siemens.com/en-US/

 

 

 

Best (and funniest) headlines from Android Police

www.androidpolice.com

 

Android 12 Beta 1 has colorful new charging animations: I'm too tired now to come up with a funny subtitle. Please laugh.

The overpriced Pixel Stand is 50% off its retail price, today only: Maybe even cheap enough to justify buying it!

Android 12 Beta 1 changes the way you'll set your alarms for the next day: All 30 of them, to make sure you get out of bed on time.

App hibernation is live in Android 12 Beta 1: You can try it out now, and by 'now', we mean in a few months.

Android 12's dynamic theming will still let you choose your own awful colors if you insist: For optimal Demon Chocobo vibes.

There are now three times more Android devices than Windows PCs: Still way more ants than both, tho.

Google Phone will announce callers like you've got a fancy secretary: But you ain't fancy. Stop playing.

Netflix teases N-Plus: A new way to get attached to your favorite Netflix shows before they're cancelled.

Google Assistant continues to mean well with socially relevant, utterly cringeworthy songs: I'll take it, if you promise never to never sing again, Google

Twitter is killing Nuzzel and it's ok if you have no idea what that means.

Box finally has a dark theme, but not without one annoying limitation: 2 years of user demands have come to this.

Amazon Echo Frames review: About as useful as an Echo Dot taped to your forehead.

 

 

Two core weaknesses of Onshape

Kernel and browser

I've come across a couple of Achilles' heels for PTC regarding Onshape. The two weaknesses are inherent to what makes Onshape Onshape.


Kernel Incompatibility. At the kernel level, Onshape is incompatible with PTC's CAD software. Onshape runs Parasolid (licensed from an arch-competitor to PTC, Siemens), while PTC has its own Granite geometric modeling kernel.  I wonder how well Onshape and Creo work together; I have not heard PTC address this problem.

The drawback to any translation is, of course, that data can be lost or, worse, mangled, and so it helps when two CAD programs share at least the same kernel.

Onshape uses the same Parasolid kernel as Solidworks, one reason being that Onshape was designed pre-PTC to take customers from Solidworks. Even so, sharing kernels is not nirvana: importing Solidworks models into Onshape can be a surprisingly difficult process, as was demonstrated at Onshape's user conference last month.

Onshape and Creo do have import-export capabilities, ones that even preexisted PTC's acquisition of Onshape. Pro/E-Creo 2000i thru v7 files are the list for Onshape imports, while a neutral file format like STEP is available to copy models from Onshape to Creo. 

The problem becomes significant now that PTC wants Creo run on the same Atlas-cloud platform as Onshape. Users will expect transparent data exchange between all apps on Atlas. How to fix the problem:

• One solution may be that PTC stores cloudCreo data in the same MongoDB database format as Onshape, and then cloudCreo acts as the translator for desktop Creo.
• Another solution could be that PTC replaces Parasolid with Granite; CAD companies have done that kind of kernel swapping before.
• A third solution is for PTC to eliminate Onshape. A second CAD program that's incompatible makes little sense.

Browser Incompatibility. During the Onshape user conference, PTC execs revealed that staying abreast of changes to Web browsers is key to Onshape's future survival. A new release of a significant Web browser could introduce incompatibilities that prevent Onshape from running properly, at least for a time. To avoid surprises, PTC runs Onshape on betas of browsers.

Onshape is, nevertheless, at the mercy of directions in browser development. For instance, Apple is not keen on making its homegrown Safari Web browser work particularly well, as that would allow third-party developers to avoid Apple's App Store by instead running Webapps in Safari.

This article on Apple details how the problem could affect Onshape: "In almost every area, Apple's low-quality implementation of features from [Apple's own] WebKit [browser engine] already requires workarounds." A Google researcher notes that "Safari is now something like 1,000 APIs behind Chrome, double the gap measured in 2016...".

Worse, Apple requires that all third-party Web browsers be built on top of Safari, even Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Mozilla Firefox. While some argue that Google is, with this research, slamming Apple because it wants to run its Chrome engine as spyware on Apple hardware, the point is still valid: Apple is fearful of apps that could run well in Safari; so it makes its browser lackluster.

(Onshape runs as native apps on Android and iOS.)

 

PTC Describes Its Plans for Generative Design

Upselling

 

Gal Munda (financial analyst): I just had a question around the generative design -- and the exciting news that you basically announced a couple of years after you first acquired [Frustum] -- you launched it as part of a Creo [desktop MCAD] extension now. What I'm thinking about is, how did these modules effectively increase your addressable market in terms of the pricing, maybe how you're thinking about what proportion of your customers are realistically potential customers of it?

Image from a PTC video of GDX (generative design extension) 

 

And do you think that there would ever be a cross-sell into competitive CAD environments as well? Or do you think that's more of a view into kind of potentially getting replacements into, say, existing Solidworks customers?

 

James Heppelmann (ceo PTC): There's a couple of different things happening with generative design.

Just to be clear, we first released it as part of the desktop application and for compute horsepower used the graphics card. That gets you quite a bit of compute horsepower for certain types of compute-intensive codes like generative design.

But what we've done now, in the second iteration, is put it on Atlas [cloud platform], where there's elastic compute. You can have the biggest computer in the world running your generative analyses for you [You might not afford the computing bill. - Editor]. 

Let me also say, one of the next steps will be to pipe that generative design capability into Onshape [cloud MCAD], because it's actually running on the same platform as Onshape now. We just got to build it out into the UI [user interface] and the functionality of Onshape.

So what we'll do with generative design is, for sure, will go back to the Creo base. And we will upsell this new module. It's a purchase you add on. And then we'll go into the Onshape base, and we'll do the same thing. I think that generative design is a brand-new idea [Generative design has been around in one form or another since the 1980s. - Editor].

It's a transformational idea, but some of these ideas started a little slow and then really take off once people understand what they can do. So I expect we'll see that pattern. I do think it will give us more competitive alternatives, because I think what we have is unique and special. [Several BIM, MCAD, and independent vendors also provide generative design, also usually in the cloud. - Editor].

I think that if somebody is thinking about switching off Solidworks, if they want to go to a high-end product, they'll be impressed by Creo. If they want to go to a simpler product that's simpler to own and so forth, they'll look at Onshape and say, Wow!

- - -

Source: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4422268-ptc-inc-ptc-ceo-james-heppelmann-on-q2-2021-results-earnings-call-transcript

The SaaS-ification of PTC's Software

Moving from dark green to light green

 

Saket Kalia (financial analyst): I'd love to zoom in on slide 20 a bit [see figure below], very useful slide. Understanding that diagram is a vision and not guidance per se, I'd love to hear how you  envision PTC's move to SaaS [software as a service].

Chart showing some aspects of some programs starting to run on Atlas; the lighter the shade of green, the more of the software is on the cloud

 

It looks like you'll have all your products available in a SaaS form -- well, the major products available in a SaaS form factor by fiscal '22.

And so the question is, is this something you perhaps drive your customer base to or encourage them to adopt? Or is this something that you're going to let happen naturally?

James Heppelmann (ceo PTC): There's a lot you can read into this slide. But if you notice that the logos, other than Onshape [Web-based CAD] and Atlas [Web-based platform], start a darker greener color and as they move to the right become more or less the same color as Atlas. That's because we call this strategy "an insidious SaaSification strategy," which means it happens step-by-step.

And it's already started. Vuforia [augmented reality software] already has the first offerings on Atlas, like expert capture. Which is one of the biggest ones. We're about to ship the second Vuforia product on Atlas, which will be called Vuforia Instruct coming out later this quarter.

We mentioned that Creo [MCAD] is shipping a capability on Atlas now for generative design called Creo GDX [based on Frustum]. And you'll start to see [capabilities] coming from Windchill [PLM] and coming from Thingworx [Internet of things].

So what we're going to do is begin to offer incremental or, in some cases, replacement modules on SaaS. And then over time, the whole suite of each product line will become available on SaaS. A customer could begin adopting a part of it, get comfortable with the idea, start to generate some incremental revenue for us. And then in year 2 or 3 or 4, [the customer could] even flip the switch and go 100% to SaaS.

So that's what that diagram intends to show you: that these products are all climbing on board, but it's not an all-or-nothing. It's step-by-step moving toward that all-state where they're fully based on Atlas, and we have really a dream, a unified SaaS portfolio.

I'm so excited about that, because a lot of these products have divergent heritages and they're on different architectures today, integrated together but still on different architectures. And we have like a spring cleaning opportunity here, thanks to the power of Atlas to unify on a single platform.

Everybody at PTC is aligned behind this. So we're making great progress. And if you think in a year or two, Windchill and Creo will have $1 billion of ARR [annual recurring revenue], if we can get some even modest degree of penetration on a 2-for-1 ARR uplift [making twice as much from subscriptions], it's a lot of growth in those businesses.

Our original thinking on SaaSification was more all-or-nothing, and then we decided that this so-called "insidious strategy" is much more interesting for everybody -- customers and PTC. The real big impact is farther to the right even in years yet to come on this chart.

Source: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4422268-ptc-inc-ptc-ceo-james-heppelmann-on-q2-2021-results-earnings-call-transcript

 

Fixed: Denon Tonearm's Failure to Lift

Mechanical error

 

When I finally bought a turntable, it was September 1980 and it was last stereo component I bought while still a university student. I decided on Denon's direct-drive semi-automatic DP-30L model, which cost me $400 -- about $1,000 in today's inflated dollars. Forty years later, this model today sells for $200-$300 on eBay.

 Names of parts and functions from the original owner's manual

For the model name, I am guessing that 'D' is short for direct-drive, 'P' for phonograph, and 'L' for lifter.

• Direct-drive means that the motor is attached directly to the spindle. The controversy at the time was that direct drive could introduce rumble noises from the electric motor turning; the alternative was the belt drive, which eliminated the rumble, but could cause imprecise speeds due to stretching of the belt. I never heard any extraneous rumble, and given that belts deteriorate over time, I am today glad I went the route I did.
  
  
• Semi-automatic means that I have to land the stylus (needle) on the record manually, but that the tonearm lifted off the record at the end of play automatically.
  
  Fully-automatic turntables place the needle on the record for you; this was considered gauche.
  Fully-manual means you have to lift the tonearm yourself when the record comes to an end; this was considered seriously-audiophile.
  Semi-automatic was a compromise, as it minimized the time the needle spent on the vinyl.

(Back then, there were even disagreements whether tonearms should be curved, like on my Denon, or straight.)

 

Lifter Stops Lifting

A couple of decades ago, the automatic lifter stopped lifting. At the time, it was no big deal to me as CDs and MP3 players were replacing turntables and cassettes. I stopped using the turntable, leaving it on display to show off next to the rest of my stereo system, which I still used.

As records came back in vogue, I wanted the Denon to be fully working again. I checked with a couple of local repair shops, who wanted to charge me $65 to $85 just to have a look at it. I decided to try on my own.

I found the www.vinylengine.com Web site (free registration required), which hosts repair and user manuals for vintage audio equipment. But, as I found with other repair manuals of the era, the instructions are so curt as to be ultimately useless.

Badly written repair instructions

So I decided to have a look myself. As Denon boasted that the turntable featured a "Non-Contact Record-End Sensor" I assumed that perhaps a light bulb had burned out. I did not, however, relish the thought of desoldering/resoldering in possibly tight quarters, let alone finding the correct replacement bulb.

 

Easy Fix

So I flipped it over, and removed seven screws (four are in the feet). The picture below shows what I found inside, compliments of liquidaudio.com.au/denon-dp-30l-direct-drive-turntable-service-repair (my annotations):

Inside the Denon turntable (front is at the bottom)

Once I oriented myself, I recognized the tonearm mechanicals in the upper-left corner. As I looked around, I noticed that the flat metal arm attached to a white plastic thingy was swinging free (outlined in orange below).

The copper coil is the tonearm lifter motor

The white plastic thingy had an axle (circled in green) sticking below it, so it was obvious to me that it belonged in a hole. But which hole was not obvious to me -- there are seven in the immediate area. Fortunately, most holes were too small for the axle, and so I found the right one in which to plug it. I reassembled the turntable.

It worked!

The puzzle to me is, of course, how the heck did it get disengaged in the first place? Never mind, I was so pleased to have saved the $65 repair bill that I played several records just for the pleasure of watching the tonearm lifting itself as it reached the end of each LP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITC vs Gstarsoft Ends in Settlement

No one lost

 

IntelliCAD Technical Consortium had launched its lawsuit against Gstarsoft about a year ago, claiming that the Chinese software vendor was misusing code from ITC's IntelliCAD. The issue was that Gstarsoft was no longer a member of the ITC, yet is appeared that some items unique to IntelliCAD were in the GStarCAD software. 

Today the results of the suit were announced; I'll run the English portion of the bi-lingual press release as it is concise:

“The IntelliCAD Technology Consortium” (the “ITC”) and Suzhou Gstarsoft Co. Ltd. (“Gstar”) are pleased to announce that they have reached a full and final global settlement resolving all disputes stemming from the parties’ prior business relationship, including a lawsuit filed by the ITC against Gstar pending in United States District Courts for the District of Oregon, and a lawsuit filed by Gstar against the ITC pending in the Intermediate People’s Court of Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China.

In the United States lawsuit, the ITC had alleged that Gstar misappropriated and improperly used the ITC’s intellectual properties. Gstar denied the allegations, and maintained that it independently developed its products and has independent intellectual property rights. In the Suzhou lawsuit, Gstar sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement.

The parties’ global settlement fully and conclusively resolves their disputes. No party has admitted any wrongdoing or liability, and there has not been any court finding as to the merits of the parties’ lawsuits. However, in order to resolve the disputes completely and avoid any future misunderstandings, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement.

The parties appreciate each other’s efforts in resolving this matter amicably.

https://www.intellicad.org/articles-and-press-releases/joint-press-release-of-the-intellicad-technology-consortium-and-suzhou-gstarsoft-co-ltd

Optimizing the news for a "we want it free" culture

The legacy fails

 

Newspapers remind me of stores that used to carry music CDs. As customers bought fewer CDs, stores carried fewer CDs, and so customers had fewer reasons to come to the store. The only stores today that still sell CDs in my hometown are Walmart and the independent Christian bookstore. The  CDs that remain are not to my taste, so iTunes is my A&B Sound (western Canadian version of Tower Records). 

Our local newspapers went the same route. We had two, each with two issues a week. One publishing chain bought the other, shut it down, and cut the pay to newspaper carriers to 9 cents per house. Last year, it used the coronavirus pandemic to reduce to one issue weekly, fat with advertising flyers.

Prior to the pandemic, it had eliminated the Letters to the Editor section; with the pandemic, it begged for donations to keep going, calling itself "your community paper," which it no longer was. With woke youngsters at the helm, the front page splashed one too many hit pieces on prominent local men and women, whose primary crime appeared to be their Christian faith. So, even though it is delivered free to my front door, I no longer read it, although I do use it to line the compost bucket.

- - -

In an important article on the future of news, Martin Gurri talks about Andrey Mir's new book, “Postjournalism and the Death of Newspapers” at discoursemagazine.com/ideas/2021/04/13/post-journalism-and-the-death-of-news.

In short, the news used to be distributed by the elite, whether as newspapers, magazines, tv, and even state-run radio. Then in the 1990s, the big shift occurred as the Internet allowed us with small voices to speak up. Now four billion people compete with the mainstream media over what is news, through forums like Facebook, blogs (like this one), email newsletters, Twitter, YouTube, and so on.

What Gurri and Mir say will help you understand the news business today and why it is so awful. For instance, they note that all news is a form of fiction, because it is presented from one person's point of view.

- - -

What these sorts of discussions seem to be unaware of are specialty publications, like the ones I produce. I think specialty publishers aren't suffering the problems of mainstream newspapers because we got certain things right:

• Adapted to new publishing technologies
• Targeted niche audiences
• Operated on sustainable budgets

We understand the new publishing technologies, and so we made use of the Internet early. I abandoned my print newsletter for an email one in 1996.  I published by first ebook in 2000 and abandoned print books by 2013. This blog has been operating since 2003. 

We target niche audiences, and so have a product that readers want. Being small, we cater to our readers and can afford to interact with them one-on-one. This ties in to an important point that the Internet revolution enabled: people want to know they are being heard -- whether Arab Spring or the bad state of BIM. 

We operate on a sustainable budget, and so we survive when large publications with huge staff, and expensive printing and distribution models flounder. As I am fond of saying, it was the computer (and then the Internet) that allowed me in 1991 to become a one-man publishing company and handle every task this job involves: subscriptions and advertising; research, writing, and editing; design, publishing, distribution, and marketing; and feedback. As I don't have a lot of expenses, I don't need a big budget.

While I agree that digital-everything is annoying, it is the primary way to survive in this the-Internet-makes-everything-free culture.

- - -

I must add my appreciation for those who gave me advice along the way, just as I was able to help others to get on their way.

 

 

 

Laptop wars! Dell vs HP

 

I've been arguing for a decade now that CPU speeds slammed to a stop around 2010, and as proof my primary desktop computer, on which I get most of my paid-work done, is indeed from 2010.

That just might make me a hypocrite after buying a new laptop last month, to replace one I got five years earlier. As I explained to my wife, there are three reasons to buy a new computer:

• Specs - there are sufficiently improved specs; the subject of this article
• Pricing - the laptop is on sale and so is reasonably priced; I look for machines in the $1,500 price range (cheap laptops just aren't worth it)
• Timing - as the laptop is a business expense, it has to fit in with my company's tax planning

My five-year-old laptop was (at the time) the top-of-the-line HP Spectre 2-in-1 (hinges fold all the way back), which still works well. Well, one of the 360-degree hinges is getting wobbly and it concerned me that a Windows 10 update was delayed for a year due to Microsoft having problems with the computer's audio driver. Also, the silver-colored keys drove me nuts, as they were hard to read, whether or not the back-lighting was on. Imagine lit-up letters on a light background; HP still sells laptops with that dreadful combination.

 

Ordering a New Laptop: Not So Easy

I initially ordered a new HP Spectre from Best Buy, but Best Buy had only two pix of the device, so then to my horror I later found it had silver keys. I cancelled the order. I found one on the HP Canada site with black keys, and ordered it ($1,550). 

Then I recalled that my son-in-law had bought a Dell over an HP. Dells tend to be invisible, as they are sold only through Dell's Web site and so make no appearance on regular outlets. I took a look at the Dell Canada Web site, and I found an equivalent model to the HP for $1,250 (incl. tax), and -- even better! -- I could pay with PayPal. I bought the Inspiron 2-in-1, sat back, and waited for it to arrive. 

A phone call from Dell told me I needed to re-order it, as they could not process my payment through PayPal. Odd, given that PayPal from my end had no problem with me. Maybe Dell didn't want to pay the PayPal fees for a laptop that was on sale ($200 off). So I reordered it.

PayPal still waiting on Dell to complete my order, six weeks later

 

With that done, I got back to HP the very same day to cancel my order for the Spectre. The nice lady on the phone reassured me the order was cancelled. A few days later, I received an email from HP telling that the laptop was... on its way to me. Back on the phone to HP: even though I had been told the order was cancelled, it nevertheless shipped the next day. No worries: HP has free return shipping, complete with paperwork that the UPS shipping office signs as proof I had dropped it off. Once HP gets back the laptop, they take "20 bank days" to refund the credit card.

The laptop arrived from HP, I checked with friends in case any wanted to buy it off me (none did), and by week's end returned the unit, unopened. In the subsequent weeks, HP sent me four more emails letting me know the exciting news that the laptop had shipped and was on its way to me! All fake news, of course.  The refund, eventually, showed up.

The Dell Inspiron 14 7405 2-in-1 that I ended up with

 

New Dell vs. New HP

So, by paying $200 less, what did I get for my money? All of the main specs were similar, such as 14" touch screen, black backlit keys, 16GB RAM, 512GB solid state drive, and Webcam shutter. Here are the primary differences: 

CPU

• Dell: 8-core AMD CPU with AMD discrete graphics
• HP: 4-core Intel CPU with Intel integrated graphics

Dell wins: The eight cores are useless for CAD and word processing, but double the speed of processing video files over four cores.

 

SD Slot

• Dell: full-size SD memory card slot
• HP: microSD slot

Dell wins: It can take both sizes of cards, with an adapter.

 

Metal Body and Color

• Dell: plastic bottom, rest of the body is metal; color is different, a dark brown called "Sandstorm"
• HP: the entire body is metal; color is the standard silver

Dell wins: no more freezing cold laptop on my lap! And the brown body is a nice change from corporate conformity.

 

Stylus

• Dell: stylus is an optional extra
• HP: stylus included

Tie: I find I don't use a stylus, so its presence or lack thereof is irrelevant.

 

Microphone Icon

The Dell shows a microphone icon in the taskbar anytime a program runs that can record, such as Zoom. This acts as a nice warning and lets me toggle off the mic easily. Not having opened the new HP, I don't know if it does the same. 

- - -

Overall, the trade-off was, for me, worthwhile. Also, I found the styling of the new HP r-e-a-l-l-y ugly. I don't know how long I could have stayed with that black and gold scheme.

The grarish styling of the HP Spectre that I ended up not buying

 

New Dell vs Old HP

So, Ralph, if you claim there is no need to get new hardware, why did you get new hardware? Well, Ralph, allow me to explain.

The biggest bugaboo of the five-year-old HP Spectre was its (lack of) battery life. I only ever got four hours out of it. Normally, not a problem, but when I was at a conference where conference organizers forgot to provide power outlets, the frustration level reached ten zillion percent.

The latest CPUs double the battery life and laptops now sport the oval-shaped USB-C ports, which I found from my Acer Chromebook to be very useful.

Here is what the new Dell does that the old HP doesn't:

• Battery lasts twice as long (about eight hours)
• Twice the RAM: 16GB vs 8GB
• USB ports charge devices really fast, unlike the old HP whose frustrating charge rate was more like a trickle
• Keyboard has black keys, so I see them now in any lighting situation
• The USB-C port takes a universal dongle (purchased earlier for the Chromebook) that lets me attach ethernet, additional USB devices, and yet another monitor.
• The old HP made it very difficult to turn off the mic; the new Dell shows a mic icon for easy access.
• Plastic bottom!

So that's what my $1,250 gets me. The old HP is stored away as a backup laptop.

There is one drawback to the new Dell compared to the old HP. The old HP had both full-size HDMI and mini-DisplayPort outputs, so I could attach two monitors easily. The Dell has the full-size HDMI for one external monitor, but I would need to use a dongle to attach a second one (thru the USB-C port). In reality, this is not a drawback, as I never use two external monitors, except to prove that I can.

- - -

A Final Oddity: I cannot find my laptop at the Dell Web site searching through the Dell Website's Search function. I can find it only by using Bing search externally to Dell.ca.

- -

Final Oddity II, to quote Final Fantasy: I never knew Dell gives out Dell Bucks (well, they call it Dell Advantage), which is 3% towards your next purchase. What could I do with $33? I perused the site and found the Dell twist mouse: $25 off on sale, plus $33 off from my Dell Bucks. You twist it one way to flatten it out for travel, twist it 180 degrees the other way for use, and to turn it on. 

 

  

 

Understanding the Divide

Centers vs Borders

---

What the Center was telling the Border, one year ago

---

 

Martin Gurri's The Revolt of The Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium (2018 edition) is the textbook for explaining the discombobulation that we peoples of the world feel today. We want discord to go away; he says it can't. Here's why.

Gurri divides the world into two: a Center made of elites (gov’t, media, academia, corporations) directing their decrees and products at the Border, which is made up of all others. In the past, Border people tended to accept what was pushed at them -- limited policy options, limited news, limited job possibilities -- so much so that they became to be known as the Silent Generation. Then technology came along.

Technology allows the Border to think and act and produce independently of the Center. The Center is furious at its diminished power, and so we hear it lashing out, accusing us of being fascists, bitter clingers, deniers, and deplorables. In turn, the Border sees the Center as inept, thieving, self-obsessed, unaccountable, and hypocritical.

A second key to understanding the split is that it is not between left and right; we see the Border and the Center on all sides of political thought. In the USA, for instance, we have seen Socialists fighting their Democratic party and Tea Partiers fighting their Republican party. My wife notes that Trump may well have came to power by taking advantage of the Center-Border divide: he is a Center person who made his appeal to people living on the Border. It explains Brexit, which was not so much a desire to leave the ultra-Center EU but a revolt against the Center in England.

 

No Winners

Gurri’s further point is that even though the Border now has power, it is unable to replace the Center, because only the Center is organized enough to run things, no matter how ineptly. As for the Border, it is too diffuse to develop and implement policy with sufficiently broad appeal. Both need each other, even as they despise each other.

The lack of cohesion is due also the the inability of the Center to receive feedback from the Border. Even when it does, the near-unlimited variety of demands made by the Border overwhelms the ability of the Center to respond.

Closer to home, this explains why large CAD vendors are tone-deaf to the concerns of users, whether the Revit-Autodesk conflict or the Solidworks-Dassault disconnect. 

The solution? There is none. Gurri thinks the current discontent is unresolvable, and may well carry on for decades. There is no unity to be had. He hopes that a new form of democracy will eventually emerge, but he (like me) says we can never predict the future, not even tomorrow.

 

Women vs. Government

An excellent Border vs. Center example took place this week. The political and medical elite of the Center in Canada's province of British Columbia announced that 55-65 year-olds could get the AstraZenica vaccine from local pharmacies. My wife and her friends in the age range were conflicted, because other elites at the Center (primarily from Europe) has been declaring AZ ineffective, dangerous, age-restricted, and the cause of blood clots. 

It was the death-by-blood-clot that concerned the women the most, as women are affected by them more often than men. Their conflicted choice was between suffering from coronavirus or from a blood clot. So these people on the Border used technology to confer through their smartphones and texting apps to make a consensus decision, independent of the Center.

(In the end, they decided that it was more likely for them to catch the virus than a clot. With the decision made, they then learned that just 13,000 doses were available for the 490,000 persons who are in their age group.)